Introduction to the Solar System


APAS 1110 Summer 1996

Lecture 15 -- Cosmic Collisions (Planetarium)

Tuesday, June 25




  • Planetarium

    6 months after this class, it will be mid-winter
    The mid-winter sky is spectacular, with more bright stars and bright constellations than the summer
    We've concentrated on the sky we see in the summer, but if you happen to think about the sky 6 months from now, when this course is long past, I'd like to show you what you might be looking at

    North:
    North star, little dipper upside down
    Cassiopeia
    Big Dipper opposite Cassiopeia
    Cepheus below
    Pegasus and Andromeda West
    Perseus above
    Auriga E of Perseus
    Gemini E of Perseus
    Leo setting

    South:
    Orion
    Lepus
    Canis major
    Canis minor
    Taurus (El Noth upper horn)
    pleiades
    Cetus, Pisces, Pegasus (due W of Orion)



  • Impact Hazard on the Earth

    Seminal paper by Clark Chapman and David Morrison 1994 Nature
    Chapman currently researching in Boulder
    1 in 10,000 chance that a large 2 km asteroid or comet will hit the Earth in the next century
    This would disrupt the ecosphere and kill a large fraction of the population of the Earth
    But this is an asteroid 1/5 as big as what killed off the dinosaurs
    Your chance of being killed by an impact is 1/20,000, same as airplane accident
    Problem is, nobody has ever been killed by an impact!
    But we ride in airplanes all the time
    There's a perceived difference between common accidents that kill small numbers of people all the time (car crashes) and massive events that kill enormous number of people
    The statistics may be the same, but we tend to think the big ones won't happen
    Small impacts happen a lot, big ones rarely
    We can make a size-frequency plot, just like for craters on the Moon


  • Impact Size-Frequency

    Here we see a plot of the size of an impacting object from space, vs. how often they happen
    A 3 m object hits the Earth every month, but burns up in the atmosphere
    It takes a 50 m object --half a football stadium size, to make it all the way through the atmosphere without breaking up
    Every year, an atomic bomb sized object, about 10 m in diameter (house)
    Every thousand years, we get a 50 m size object that explodes near the ground --Tunguska in Siberia
    If this had exploded above a city, it would have caused 10's of thousands of deaths
    Every 10,000 years (just slightly longer than recorded history) a 1 km size object could hit the Earth
    A 1 km size object is enough to cause global damage, with 10% or more of the Earth's population being killed
    A 10 km object hits every 100 m years or so (massive comet or mid-size asteroid)
    That means there have been about 40 of these incredibly catastrophic events during the history of the Earth
    We are just now beginning to understand the significance of this -- may have shaped the evolution of life to a great degree, by killing off most species, and allowing proliferation of new species on the rebound


  • Examples of Fatality Rates

    1/100 chance of automobile accident
    Murder is next (in the USA, highest murder rate for a country not at war)
    Impact death chance may be as high as 1/3000
    Asteroid comet impact about the same as airplane crash, but more likely than flood, tornado, snake bite
    Drinking water because of organic contamination 1/10 million
    Authors cite huge governmental expenditures to try and reduce the chances of all these risks, but don't consider impacts
    Conclusion -- we should be investing resources in saving the planet from a huge impact
    This may be a policy issue that faces us in the future
    But it will no doubt be a debate with lots of facts thrown around
    Critical thinking and a careful consideration of the facts is necessary
    Perhaps we should think about the ways we use our resources to put off risks -- health care crisis, pouring tons of money into saving the lives of people who are terminally ill, for example
    We are in a position with our technology to do almost anything to preserve life, while at the same time, it is very likely that the quality of the life that we preserve goes down, because of the unhindered growth of science and technology.
    Should we pour money into an ambitious program to stave off death from space?

    6/25/96